We verify whether your data is safe to use for AI and automated decisions.
We examine your data and give a clear result:
it is acceptable for AI use, or it is not.
If it is not, we document exactly where the weaknesses are.
We do not fix them. We do not advise on them.
We simply record the facts so others can act on them.
AI systems don’t fail on purpose.
They fail because the information they rely on is incomplete, inconsistent, or misunderstood.
Once AI is involved, data stops being a technical detail.
It becomes the basis for decisions that affect people, money, and risk.
At that point, assumptions are not enough.
Someone needs to verify whether the data is actually fit to be used.
That is why this company exists.
We independently examine organisational data to determine two things:
Whether it is acceptable for use in AI models and automated systems
Where the structural weaknesses are if it is not
Our work produces a clear, written record of:
what was examined
what was found
what can and cannot be safely done with the data
Nothing more. Nothing less.
We do not:
improve your data
redesign your systems
recommend tools or vendors
provide remediation advice
This separation is deliberate.
It ensures our findings remain neutral, defensible, and usable by
your internal teams, consultants, or technical partners.
Our verification is used by organisations that need to:
deploy AI responsibly
justify automated decisions
answer questions from boards, regulators, or clients
understand data risk before action is taken
We do not influence decisions.
We make the condition of the data clear so decisions can be made with confidence.
This service is for organisations that:
are introducing AI or automation
rely on data for consequential decisions
need clarity, not reassurance
It is not for organisations looking for guidance, opinions, or optimisation.
We verify whether data is acceptable for AI use and clearly document the weaknesses when it is not.